View Single Post
Old 06-03-2011, 01:48 PM   #38
Adimos

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
Except that that's not true:



As is plainly clear - the Baby Boomers did NOT replace themselves in double. They didn't even replace themselves. The succeeding generation is smaller - thus it's harder to pay for their support.
True, but your graph doesn't explain the discrepancy between losing people from the workforce, and the increasing population. Actually the spike in birth around 1990 would be people entering the workforce starting a couple years ago through now.
Adimos is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:10 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity