DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Desperation: Obama Surrogate JEW Calls to Make Voting Mandatory

**comprar-espana** · 06-25-2012, 02:33 AM

Right but think about the ironic part of your statement. By NOT voting, you're submitting to the majority and I'd say that's even more of an issue of "consent".

Not at all. Ignorance of a foreign law is ignorance of a fact. Ignorance of fact is never criminal. By making declarations and engaging in adhesion contracts you become domestic and then you really have to worry about what the majority does because you have made yourself a subject.

The problem with this country is that more people vote that shouldn't and the only people that you can vote for are bought and paid for, it's never a win win, it's always lose lose, or the lesser or two evils.

People think they vote to people put into office. Instead they merely make it possible for the successful candidate to assume office in a de facto manner. Whether he becomes de jure or not depends upon his taking an oath and submitting a bond. If you vote you don't have to worry about de facto vs de jure because the oath is NEVER given to any of the voters. The oath is given to people who don't participate and who want to be able to prosecute trespasses. People who vote can't sue. They agreed.

In a republic anyone can step into an office they see is vacant. In my case I sensed that there was nobody that any of these politicians oaths were given to so I decided to fill that office. When Steve (Obama) took office I gave him a legal notice telling him I expected officials in my government to send me their oath and bond. I never heard from Steve so he has little protection should he decide to perform a trespass.

Who knows? Maybe that is why I haven't heard much from government.

06-25-2012, 02:33 AM	#4
comprar-espana Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 517 Senior Member	Right but think about the ironic part of your statement. By NOT voting, you're submitting to the majority and I'd say that's even more of an issue of "consent". Not at all. Ignorance of a foreign law is ignorance of a fact. Ignorance of fact is never criminal. By making declarations and engaging in adhesion contracts you become domestic and then you really have to worry about what the majority does because you have made yourself a subject. The problem with this country is that more people vote that shouldn't and the only people that you can vote for are bought and paid for, it's never a win win, it's always lose lose, or the lesser or two evils. People think they vote to people put into office. Instead they merely make it possible for the successful candidate to assume office in a de facto manner. Whether he becomes de jure or not depends upon his taking an oath and submitting a bond. If you vote you don't have to worry about de facto vs de jure because the oath is NEVER given to any of the voters. The oath is given to people who don't participate and who want to be able to prosecute trespasses. People who vote can't sue. They agreed. In a republic anyone can step into an office they see is vacant. In my case I sensed that there was nobody that any of these politicians oaths were given to so I decided to fill that office. When Steve (Obama) took office I gave him a legal notice telling him I expected officials in my government to send me their oath and bond. I never heard from Steve so he has little protection should he decide to perform a trespass. Who knows? Maybe that is why I haven't heard much from government.
	Quote