View Single Post
Old 01-10-2012, 06:51 PM   #6
ResuNezily

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
You catch more flies with honey than vinegar, and I woke more people up with emotional arguments than I did with logical ones. This saddens me but I did what I had to do to get the job done, and always tried to turn people back onto the path of logic at the end.



In martial arts there is the concept of blending. It is so very hard to counter somebody's force directly - but if you blend with their force (go the same direction as they are) it immediately unbalances them, and their power becomes your power.


Sometimes you have to (unfortunately) argue this way, as well. People want to be scared, they are conditioned to be scared. They don't believe there is a problem if they are not scared. So you scare them a little bit, followed by logical, rational solutions. Usually I make an emphasis on personal responsibility and taking personal power back for onesself.


I mean, it isn't out and out dishonest to use emotional arguments, but it isn't exactly honest either. What we are facing IS scary, but what we are facing has no emotional solutions. Only logical ones. Gut reactions, revenge, blanket accusations, etc, are going to go nowhere. The only solutions to TPTB-problem are exposure and logic.
Interesting that you reference arguments related to personal responsibility. I've observed that arguments directed at personal responsibility tend to be very powerful arguments. I think in this way TPTB often create a very distorted sense of personal responsibility in the proles that tends to result in the 'blame the victim' phenomena.

Orwell: "The integrated man seldom has a developed sense of responsibility." (paraphrase, I can't find the exact quote)

dys
ResuNezily is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:24 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity