This is part and parcel of both Roman law and civil law. The concept incorporates one of the key aspects of law, namely, REASON. Reason is a key component of common law. While it is true most judicial actors might issue a warrant for ARREST yet if you do not come when SUMMONED (Pavlov's response? Like a dog being trained?) then the ARREST has no basis in law if merely issued for a failure to appear when SUMMONED. Unless you consider the topic carefully the chances are you will not come up with the concept on your own. People have been programmed to respond yet when they do so improperly they establish the legal authority of the judicial actor who is going to extend his/her jurisdiction to them. Nip it in the bud early and you stand a better chance of draining the swamp rather than defending yourself against alligators/sharks/attorners. Any rebuttal? Anywhere? Anyone?