View Single Post
Old 11-28-2011, 03:11 AM   #33
shemadagaswer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
no need Ted K from BBC aptly did it for him and I somewhat have to agree.
1. I am not sure exactly how bad that car was seeing that it was still easily then 2nd best car of the day
2. you can't compare cruising around with push botton gear shifts to manualy having to short shift the gears over the course fo an entire race

anyway, I give him some credit for knowing his history
but the cynic in me says that it seemed planned for Webber to win and even if there was some problem with Vettel's car, it wasn't nearly as serious as to affect his overall race strategy.
If the car was that seriously damaged and doing the lap times it was in the few laps before Webber's incident, then accordingly, Both Button and Alonso would have easily caught him up, but after Webber passed him, somehow the car seemd to have blanced out in terms of time and h cruised for the remainder of the race. Even allowing himself to speed up and do some good times at the end.
Gearbox issues get worse of the course of a race, not better.
What a bout the much higher G forces compared to 1991?
shemadagaswer is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:08 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity