View Single Post
Old 06-05-2011, 09:26 PM   #16
6Rexw51X

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
458
Senior Member
Default
the same well funded Lotus, with a number of respected F1 engineers such as Gascoyne, 2 race winning drivers and a bunch of Red Bull/Renault bits on?

Don't forget Hispania also have the back end of the Williams strapped to their dog of a chassis.

Virgin genuinely are still going it alone, and are comfortabley ahead of Hispania on pace and for all of Lotus's improvements, they are still generally a chunk of time away from the back of the established teams.

The fact remains that the CFD method has resulted in a car that is good enough to take its place in the F1 grid, qualifies within the 107% and in only its second season, on what is probably the lowest budget in F1. The experiment was a success in my eyes, and is just the tip of the iceberg, the sheer amount of learning they have to do with their system and design process is immense and they are obviously not far from the right track. I think its a real pity its not been given another couple of years to see the benefits start to come through.
We've obviously been watching different races. The fact that Lotus is not doing well compared to the established teams is beside the point. As I wrote, they're suddenly several seconds a lap faster than Virgin and they were quite equal last year. One is using a wind tunnel and the other one isn't. The gap between Hispania and Virgin has also shrunk despite Hispania's problems over the winter time. Virgin had more time to develop their car for this year than Hispania but it didn't help them at all. CFD is not ready yet.
6Rexw51X is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:59 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity