The basketball/soccer analogy is very good. I think in addition to the design of the cars, there's also the design of the tracks to consider. One thing that Hermann Tilke does well is create tracks which encourage overtaking, but this comes at the expense of the actual spectacle. At Shanghai we often see slipstream passes down the long back straight. These are all valid overtakes, but they are just not exciting to watch, because — like points in basketball — they're easy to come by. In its most recent F1 incarnation the Imola circuit was criticised for creating processional races. Yet the 2005 and 2006 San Marino GPs produced brilliant, tense battles to the finish between Alonso and Schumacher. Even though there was no passing and very little chance of it, there was always the possibility that one driver would make a mistake or send a wild move up the inside of the other. That's exciting racing and we had that in Turkey as well. In my opinion Formula 1 should focus on reducing the aerodynamic wake of the cars, but also race on more tracks like Imola. The barriers to pulling off a move should then be more in the drivers' minds rather than purely coming from the cars in front.