DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Fruriourl** · 03-23-2009, 09:00 PM

It seems bonkers that the FIA can say something is legal and the Stewards something different.

It is pretty shocking and just highlights how subjective the Formula 1 rules are, theres no clear right or wrong.

Who would have the final say in this? Max says its up the the Stewards? But I remember in 2006 with the mass dampers, Renault were told by the FIA (Ferrari International Assistance ??) that it was illegal, and the Stewards said it was legal.

That would suggest that it only goes to the FIA to decide if the Steward decision is appealed?

03-23-2009, 09:00 PM	#15
Fruriourl Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 452 Senior Member	It seems bonkers that the FIA can say something is legal and the Stewards something different. It is pretty shocking and just highlights how subjective the Formula 1 rules are, theres no clear right or wrong. Who would have the final say in this? Max says its up the the Stewards? But I remember in 2006 with the mass dampers, Renault were told by the FIA (Ferrari International Assistance ??) that it was illegal, and the Stewards said it was legal. That would suggest that it only goes to the FIA to decide if the Steward decision is appealed?
	Quote