DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**DfrtYhyu** · 12-28-2008, 02:33 PM

He doesn't want it this year, but he thinks KERS is ok for 2012?

And then he says things shouldn't happen over night, and that they should happen year after year.

Well, yes, exactly Mr. di Montezemolo. F1's change to more energy efficency should be gradual. That's why KERS needs to happen now, and other things should follow year after year.

Does it cost a lot to develop KERS? Yes, you bet. But it's cost well spent on the direction the sport should take, not on tyre warmers and fuel hose.

KERS's time has come, and if anything, it is overdue for F1 to take a step in the direction of more fuel efficiency. di Montezemolo just sounds like he's not happy with how Ferrari's KERS is shaping.

On Singapore, I agree with him.

12-28-2008, 02:33 PM	#8
DfrtYhyu Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 512 Senior Member	He doesn't want it this year, but he thinks KERS is ok for 2012? And then he says things shouldn't happen over night, and that they should happen year after year. Well, yes, exactly Mr. di Montezemolo. F1's change to more energy efficency should be gradual. That's why KERS needs to happen now, and other things should follow year after year. Does it cost a lot to develop KERS? Yes, you bet. But it's cost well spent on the direction the sport should take, not on tyre warmers and fuel hose. KERS's time has come, and if anything, it is overdue for F1 to take a step in the direction of more fuel efficiency. di Montezemolo just sounds like he's not happy with how Ferrari's KERS is shaping. On Singapore, I agree with him.
	Quote