DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**ImmitsRom** · 10-16-2008, 12:07 PM

The Difference with Canada and France is they said "No thank you" to Bernie as opposed to Bernie removing them. If too many more tracks decide the price they have to pay is too high, Bernie might have to seek his own bailout to cover his note. It seems I remember some venues saying the cost of staging a Grand Prix is seldom recovered by the event. Bernie better realize that F1 is relevant as entertainment only and quite frankly, it hasn't been too entertaining for awhile.

10-16-2008, 12:07 PM	#14
ImmitsRom Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 607 Senior Member	The Difference with Canada and France is they said "No thank you" to Bernie as opposed to Bernie removing them. If too many more tracks decide the price they have to pay is too high, Bernie might have to seek his own bailout to cover his note. It seems I remember some venues saying the cost of staging a Grand Prix is seldom recovered by the event. Bernie better realize that F1 is relevant as entertainment only and quite frankly, it hasn't been too entertaining for awhile.
	Quote