Thread
:
The FIA
View Single Post
04-02-2008, 07:00 PM
#
4
Aeaefee
Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
447
Senior Member
My personal issues with max don't stem from his recent activities (though they don't help).
It's the complete lack of accountability and oversight on his decisions that concerns me.
We all go on about motorsport, but that is, in reality, a small part of the FIA's remit.
it is the peak body for auto clubs (rac, adac, racv etc) around the world, and max is elected by and answerable to these people. however, does anybody know how these delegates are posted to their positions?
does anybody know the process that needs to be undertaken to change a delegate whose decisions they are dissatisfied with?
in australia, it is theoretically possible, though practically impossible, to change the club's representatives by vote. most people join a car club to have somebody help them when their car breaks down in the rain, and they couldn't care less about politics. if a good candidate wants to run, they have little chance of having enough little people vote to make the election valid, regardless of whether they win by one vote or 10 votes to one.
then, the sitting board member usually resigns mid-term, allowing the board nomination of another person (of similar mind, naturally) rather than facing an election.
one alternative is the shemozzle that became of the NRMA once major politics got involved.
yet it is from this noble, democratic and member-driven scenario that max has drawn his power.
a representative of the will of motorists, indeed...
Quote
Aeaefee
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Aeaefee
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
05:09 AM
.