DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**pkxlugbsbv** · 03-24-2008, 07:33 AM

BeansBeansBeans thanks for the backing.

I just thought it was strange that you replied to DonJippo saying he was ignorant of the rules when he was merely making the same point but with humour.

The thing is JJanicke seems to think it IS an aero device so he's not completely right Personally I think it's a good bash

I too agree that the moving wheel cover is doesn't justify a thread. If there was any advantage gained I'm sure it was unintentional. No need for disquilification

I do not consider it a movable areo device. The FIA classified it as legal last year. That said I do find it strange that a mass damper is considered a movable aero device and therefore banned, and a brake cooling system, that clearly moves with relation to the sprung chassis and improves airflow around the wheels isn't considered one.

So bash away, while knowing I was right all along

03-24-2008, 07:33 AM	#23
pkxlugbsbv Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 594 Senior Member	BeansBeansBeans thanks for the backing. I just thought it was strange that you replied to DonJippo saying he was ignorant of the rules when he was merely making the same point but with humour. The thing is JJanicke seems to think it IS an aero device so he's not completely right Personally I think it's a good bash I too agree that the moving wheel cover is doesn't justify a thread. If there was any advantage gained I'm sure it was unintentional. No need for disquilification I do not consider it a movable areo device. The FIA classified it as legal last year. That said I do find it strange that a mass damper is considered a movable aero device and therefore banned, and a brake cooling system, that clearly moves with relation to the sprung chassis and improves airflow around the wheels isn't considered one. So bash away, while knowing I was right all along
	Quote