View Single Post
Old 09-27-2012, 09:01 AM   #20
Kitdowstyhodo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default


I guess I should have specified that the dog must be purebred bully of some sort There are people with 90+ dogs with APBT pedigrees calling them APBTs, but we say they're wrong because of what their dog looks like. So why is this any different?

I'm not sure how to justify calling my ADBA-type, probably going to be under 45 pounds adult weight pup an Am Bully? lol

LIKE I SAID - This thread wasn't asking if my dog is APBT or Am Bully... it was merely asking for information on the dogs in his pedigree, especially the Hemphill/Wilder dogs. I really don't care for your opinions on if he's an APBT/Am Bully
but if it's Bully, AmStaff, and APBT, it isn't really purebred, is it? :P

Not that I'm disagreeing with you. If I had a dog like yours I'd just call it an APBT. Maybe Pitterstaff, like Mutt said.

---------- Post added at 08:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:47 PM ----------

Its not the pedigree that makes a dog bully. Geez its the body type.
That's incorrect. Bullies come in many body types. Not all of them are fat hippos. Just because one is athletic doesn't make it an APBT.
Kitdowstyhodo is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:46 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity