DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Sdinozes** · 05-05-2010, 04:19 AM

Not sure what you don't get either, you can go ahead and black and white things all you want. It doesn't change the fact that situations vary so enourmously.

Trust me, I get it, you can spin however you wish but your not ever going to convince me that placing your dog in a failing situation is anything to practice or embraced.

The only two dogs that aren't bullies that live in the neighbourhood are owned by my mother and one of my neighbours. The lab-mix, Marley, belongs to a neighbour, and she is one of Bransens' best friends.
Her owners and I know one another very well, as does everyone else in the community, and everyone who is exposed to my dog is well aware of what potential he has. So all these folks who reside in the same town as you would be ok with your dog if it killed thiers ? Bull shit on that ! You can bet that if that ever happened the demand for your dogs life would surely follow an incident that claimed the life of someone elses pet.

You're generalising it, black and white. Yup, thats because it is black and white.

Without knowing the details, you can't make such a judgement.
Just as I cannot judge anyone on this forum as owners because I have absolutely no idea or proof of what their ownership status is. Yes I can judge the situation and shall continue to do so until foolish minded people get it that placing a terrier known for its combat skills in a failing situation is a bad friggin idea. Its one thing when you gamble your own dogs life away its another when my innocent dogs lives are thrown into the mix. Its people like me who suffer when BSL gets passed, all the rest of you will move onto the next fad of dog while the people who respect these dogs are left broken hearted and dogless. Please explain to me how else we are suppose to view it.

I am not arguing or agreeing to either side, I am simply representing the gray areas of the matter.

See above, there is no gray area.

05-05-2010, 04:19 AM	#37
Sdinozes Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 408 Senior Member	Not sure what you don't get either, you can go ahead and black and white things all you want. It doesn't change the fact that situations vary so enourmously. Trust me, I get it, you can spin however you wish but your not ever going to convince me that placing your dog in a failing situation is anything to practice or embraced. The only two dogs that aren't bullies that live in the neighbourhood are owned by my mother and one of my neighbours. The lab-mix, Marley, belongs to a neighbour, and she is one of Bransens' best friends. Her owners and I know one another very well, as does everyone else in the community, and everyone who is exposed to my dog is well aware of what potential he has. So all these folks who reside in the same town as you would be ok with your dog if it killed thiers ? Bull shit on that ! You can bet that if that ever happened the demand for your dogs life would surely follow an incident that claimed the life of someone elses pet. You're generalising it, black and white. Yup, thats because it is black and white. Without knowing the details, you can't make such a judgement. Just as I cannot judge anyone on this forum as owners because I have absolutely no idea or proof of what their ownership status is. Yes I can judge the situation and shall continue to do so until foolish minded people get it that placing a terrier known for its combat skills in a failing situation is a bad friggin idea. Its one thing when you gamble your own dogs life away its another when my innocent dogs lives are thrown into the mix. Its people like me who suffer when BSL gets passed, all the rest of you will move onto the next fad of dog while the people who respect these dogs are left broken hearted and dogless. Please explain to me how else we are suppose to view it. I am not arguing or agreeing to either side, I am simply representing the gray areas of the matter. See above, there is no gray area.
	Quote