DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Wsjltrhe** · 08-28-2009, 12:20 AM

so if less than 50 % of a dogs close up heritage is untested...thats a gamebred dog in your book is it ?...some folk just dont set their standards high enough if thats the case.
yes carver put game dogs and match winners out into the game so what....it still doesnt make his breeding principals correct in what we today know to be " breeding gamedogs "......if you want to take carvers word to the bank because he had a good record in dogs then so be it.....

ronald mcdonald has a good name in cheeseburgers but he probably couldnt cook one !.....some folk hang on every word they are told by their elders and betters without even questioning it..........i used to sit for many hours talking breeding with one of the best breeders i ever knew in the game but as much as i learned there was some stuff i plain didnt agree with....breeding is about opinions,if one man was right we would all just copy him !

You are throwing percentages in and not once in any of my posts I had mentioned numbers.

I didn't say that Carver's breeding practices were correct but I'm not going to sit here and question it ethier. He is more successful in the game than you, me, and 99% of all gamedog owners.

My question to you is if you don't considered the pup "gamebred" but as it matures,its tested hard, and turns out to be a deep game dog, what do you call it then? A game dog that wasn't "gamebred"? See what I'm trying to get at?

One man's cur is another man's game winner.

Carver wasn't the only one who bred untested females...

You summed it best, "breeding is about opinions."

08-28-2009, 12:20 AM	#30
Wsjltrhe Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 465 Senior Member	so if less than 50 % of a dogs close up heritage is untested...thats a gamebred dog in your book is it ?...some folk just dont set their standards high enough if thats the case. yes carver put game dogs and match winners out into the game so what....it still doesnt make his breeding principals correct in what we today know to be " breeding gamedogs "......if you want to take carvers word to the bank because he had a good record in dogs then so be it..... ronald mcdonald has a good name in cheeseburgers but he probably couldnt cook one !.....some folk hang on every word they are told by their elders and betters without even questioning it..........i used to sit for many hours talking breeding with one of the best breeders i ever knew in the game but as much as i learned there was some stuff i plain didnt agree with....breeding is about opinions,if one man was right we would all just copy him ! You are throwing percentages in and not once in any of my posts I had mentioned numbers. I didn't say that Carver's breeding practices were correct but I'm not going to sit here and question it ethier. He is more successful in the game than you, me, and 99% of all gamedog owners. My question to you is if you don't considered the pup "gamebred" but as it matures,its tested hard, and turns out to be a deep game dog, what do you call it then? A game dog that wasn't "gamebred"? See what I'm trying to get at? One man's cur is another man's game winner. Carver wasn't the only one who bred untested females... You summed it best, "breeding is about opinions."
	Quote