DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**ecosportpol_ru** · 07-26-2012, 04:28 AM

I think any ideas that may spur some improvement are good, but they're not all doable from a forum standpoint. Having multiple threads really isn't an option. I like the idea of the reviewers updating their first post with links, but I think it needs to be left up to them to choose if they want to do it. I think Jman's method is pretty helpful as well, though I understand why some may feel that it's daunting to tear into a testing thread.

No doubt. It would definitely require a little more work, but like I said, I think having it be totally optional and voluntary would work. If you don't want to do it, fine. But I know plenty of testers that I think would put in the extra effort. Also what do you mean by multiple threads? I'm confused.

07-26-2012, 04:28 AM	#24
ecosportpol_ru Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 323 Senior Member	I think any ideas that may spur some improvement are good, but they're not all doable from a forum standpoint. Having multiple threads really isn't an option. I like the idea of the reviewers updating their first post with links, but I think it needs to be left up to them to choose if they want to do it. I think Jman's method is pretty helpful as well, though I understand why some may feel that it's daunting to tear into a testing thread. No doubt. It would definitely require a little more work, but like I said, I think having it be totally optional and voluntary would work. If you don't want to do it, fine. But I know plenty of testers that I think would put in the extra effort. Also what do you mean by multiple threads? I'm confused.
	Quote