View Single Post
Old 04-05-2011, 02:24 PM   #12
lorryuncori

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
395
Senior Member
Default
Eh, there's enough pictures of dead people out there. One more doesn't add value, and is subject to way too much abuse by too many of my idiot countrymen.
I fuly agree. That's why I voted no.

No evidence will convince some people.
Not a picture (Oh, it could have been photoshop!),
not the body (oh, it's another person, that's why they shot him in the face), not the DNA (whose DNA did they REALLY compare it to?),
not a video (Hollywood at work).

The same group of people still doubting that even the long form birth certificate is real will NOT believe anything they don't want to believe.

In addition, why provoke Bin Laden's supporters by displaying gorry pictures of their "holy man?"
I know that Americans have a love story with blood, guts and violence, and that they love their guns. But why encourage that even further!

They can watch a good horror movie, or a war movie, that might give them their "pint of blood" for the day.

Enough is enough. There is no reason to desecrate a dead man, to swallow in horror, and to antagonize and provoke Islam's extremist, just to give satisfaction to the perpetual conspiracy theorists of this world. They will NEVER be satisfied.
lorryuncori is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:58 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity