DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - After Death of USB--do we fear another leader? NO

**Cyncceply** · 02-06-2011, 02:42 AM

OK, a partial vaginal examination.

Are we "safe" if we let government partially penetrate our wives at airports?

As I said before, I am not a fan of airport security. Not because I think that they are all perverts, I believe they are just doing their jobs, and probably NOT liking it very much!

But I do not believe that they will just kidnap your wife to finger her!(actually, they would more likely kidnap you and finger your anal cavity! yuk!)

And if you're so afraid of that . . . take the body scan!

Now, the reason I am not a fan of airport security is because I believe it would be a lot easier for a terrorist wanting to bomb an airport to do it about 2 minutes before they reach the screener. Why wait until they get on a plane, where ONLY a maximum of about 300 people could be killed, when they could explode their bomb just before the scanner, and kill every security guard, and every passenger waiting to be screened, plus created such a chaos that another 200 people could easily be trampled and the airport damaged, and flights disrupted for weeks, if not months!

So, I think it is kind of silly to search people. The only thing that seems pretty efficient are the dogs. They would detect a terrorist BEFORE scanning!

02-06-2011, 02:42 AM	#15
Cyncceply Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 495 Senior Member	OK, a partial vaginal examination. Are we "safe" if we let government partially penetrate our wives at airports? As I said before, I am not a fan of airport security. Not because I think that they are all perverts, I believe they are just doing their jobs, and probably NOT liking it very much! But I do not believe that they will just kidnap your wife to finger her!(actually, they would more likely kidnap you and finger your anal cavity! yuk!) And if you're so afraid of that . . . take the body scan! Now, the reason I am not a fan of airport security is because I believe it would be a lot easier for a terrorist wanting to bomb an airport to do it about 2 minutes before they reach the screener. Why wait until they get on a plane, where ONLY a maximum of about 300 people could be killed, when they could explode their bomb just before the scanner, and kill every security guard, and every passenger waiting to be screened, plus created such a chaos that another 200 people could easily be trampled and the airport damaged, and flights disrupted for weeks, if not months! So, I think it is kind of silly to search people. The only thing that seems pretty efficient are the dogs. They would detect a terrorist BEFORE scanning!
	Quote