DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Hftqdxpm** · 08-04-2011, 08:39 PM

The ignorance in your post shines with the light of a thousand suns...

The lack of explanation, facts, and reasoning is blindingly bright in your posts.

SSGT Jones, on duty in Afghanistan, needs things. He needs bullets, he needs weapons. He needs food and he needs support. In what way is he "thieving scum"? He should not be there, period. This country gets absolutely no benefit from him being there. Morons think that he is taking care of the "turrism" problem there, but he's not. The best way to prevent "turrism" is to actually have our borders and coastlines seriously defended, for once. The National Guard and Coast Guard can do those things.

So, you've absolutely zero experience in anything regarding the military. You are completely ignorant of what they require. You are completely ignorant of what they do. That's quite a crooked game you want to run. Do you expect me to let you get away with framing the terms of the debate such that the only people who are allowed to criticize military policy are those who are or have been in the military? According to your thinking, the only people who should be allowed to criticize Scientology are Scientologists. That is bullshit.

You want me to give a huge fraction of what I earn to wasteful cocksuckers, and then when I protest, you tell me that my criticism isn't valid because I have "absolutely zero experience in anything regarding the military." How about we give NASA 500 billion dollars a year, and then when you protest, I'll give you a taste of your own medicine and ask to see your PhD in a related science.

Got it... Yeah, just like when you bitched about NASA smashing a probe into the Moon to look for water there. Where is your PhD in Physics, Astronomy, Geology, or anything remotely related to any of those fields?

This is even more ignorant than your other bullshit. You're turning "ignorance" into an art form. You turn hypocrisy into a nauseating habit. When do you plan on ceasing all criticism of all government spending that does not pertain to your area of expertise?

I have no "Bible thumping allies". I don't read (although I have), nor do I believe in, the Bible. You worship the military, which is loaded with Bible thumping freaks, and which is supported by tens of millions of Bible thumping freaks. That makes Bible thumping freaks very much your peeps.

I've also never stated that citizens don't have a say in how their government operates. But, since you've made the claim that I have, you need to provide a link to where I made such a statement. Otherwise, you'll just look, you know... Ignorant... So, should Congress, or shouldn't Congress, listen to the thoughts of people who want to cut military spending, whether or not they are veterans?

You understand nothing... You have a habit of making empty assertions, perpetually angry man.

You are beligerence personified... You're the one who delights in collateral damage as long as the people aren't US citizens.

08-04-2011, 08:39 PM	#19
Hftqdxpm Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 450 Senior Member	The ignorance in your post shines with the light of a thousand suns... The lack of explanation, facts, and reasoning is blindingly bright in your posts. SSGT Jones, on duty in Afghanistan, needs things. He needs bullets, he needs weapons. He needs food and he needs support. In what way is he "thieving scum"? He should not be there, period. This country gets absolutely no benefit from him being there. Morons think that he is taking care of the "turrism" problem there, but he's not. The best way to prevent "turrism" is to actually have our borders and coastlines seriously defended, for once. The National Guard and Coast Guard can do those things. So, you've absolutely zero experience in anything regarding the military. You are completely ignorant of what they require. You are completely ignorant of what they do. That's quite a crooked game you want to run. Do you expect me to let you get away with framing the terms of the debate such that the only people who are allowed to criticize military policy are those who are or have been in the military? According to your thinking, the only people who should be allowed to criticize Scientology are Scientologists. That is bullshit. You want me to give a huge fraction of what I earn to wasteful cocksuckers, and then when I protest, you tell me that my criticism isn't valid because I have "absolutely zero experience in anything regarding the military." How about we give NASA 500 billion dollars a year, and then when you protest, I'll give you a taste of your own medicine and ask to see your PhD in a related science. Got it... Yeah, just like when you bitched about NASA smashing a probe into the Moon to look for water there. Where is your PhD in Physics, Astronomy, Geology, or anything remotely related to any of those fields? This is even more ignorant than your other bullshit. You're turning "ignorance" into an art form. You turn hypocrisy into a nauseating habit. When do you plan on ceasing all criticism of all government spending that does not pertain to your area of expertise? I have no "Bible thumping allies". I don't read (although I have), nor do I believe in, the Bible. You worship the military, which is loaded with Bible thumping freaks, and which is supported by tens of millions of Bible thumping freaks. That makes Bible thumping freaks very much your peeps. I've also never stated that citizens don't have a say in how their government operates. But, since you've made the claim that I have, you need to provide a link to where I made such a statement. Otherwise, you'll just look, you know... Ignorant... So, should Congress, or shouldn't Congress, listen to the thoughts of people who want to cut military spending, whether or not they are veterans? You understand nothing... You have a habit of making empty assertions, perpetually angry man. You are beligerence personified... You're the one who delights in collateral damage as long as the people aren't US citizens.
	Quote