WTC7 is not right next to 1 and 2. There was an entire building between them. The initial investigation into WTC7 stated that its collapse warranted further investigation, there wasn't a clear explanation of why it collapsed. Eventually that investigation was done by NIST. The NIST report, while answering some questions and offering some scenarios, was far from conclusive, imo. (by the way, the popular mechanics 'debunking' was one of the worst debunking jobs I've ever seen, they should be embarrassed by the lack of engineering and science they presented). There are plenty of reasons to still remain suspicious about the collapse of WTC7, not the least of which is that it housed critical information for the SEC, the FBI and the CIA. To my knowledge, absolutely NO investigation has ever targeted Marvin Bush (pres bush's brother), even though: Marvin headed the security company for WTC7, 1, and 2. Marvin sat on the board of the insurance company for WTC1and2 Marvin did not disclose his potential conflict of interest (of running the security for the complex) when he filed his paperwork to be on the insurance company board. Marvin co-owned the airport security screening company at Dulles Airport ... with a Kuwaiti owner. Ignoring that circumstantial evidence goes beyond incompetence. If a person with that many ties to a murder victim was never investigated, the detective ignoring that evidence would be fired. So no, its not proof that WTC7 was intentionally destroyed, or that the bush family was involved with 9/11, but it certainly leaves a big question mark as to why a proper investigation of the biggest mass murder in US history wasn't performed. At the very least that level of incompetence should have been grounds for impeaching bush who, after all, was responsible for the safety and security of the people of the United States. By the way, the total number of times that Marvin Bush's name comes up in the 'official 911 report'? Zero.