[cajonnmu]

You don't agree with the definition?

No, because terrorism isn't always targeted for political gain. There's no one single definition of "terrorism" that's agreed on, though...

What knowledge do you have in the area? My last several years in the Navy was spent working in the field...

So did you catch bin Laden, yet? Not my job...

Nope, just someone who has a brain instead of just balls. Well, thank you for confirming that which I've always suspected you lack...

The people who financed it/provided logistics are fundamentally in the same boat as the people who fed them or sold them weapons. You don't think that selling them weapons is wrong?

The people who committed the crime are dead. Your insight is fucking astounding...

The one's who planned it were likely less competent than those carrying it out. Not true, and that statement shows your lack of understanding of how terrorist cells operate, and how they're organized...

You think bin Laden has the skills to carry out such an attack? The skills? Yeah, he did. He wouldn't have been able to do it, however, because of his notoriety. He was a wanted man before 9/11. He didn't do it because he's at the top of the Al Qaeda food chain...

I doubt it. People often doubt things they have no knowledge of...

The way I see it, assembling such a group is sometimes a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Hardly. There's a never-ending line of people waiting to serve Allah...

Thanks to the Iraq invasion, they no longer have to pick out International terrorists and experts to kill Americans. They can just use retards if they so choose. They pick those who ideologically opposed to the United States and what it stands for. Some may be retards. Some have been college graduates.

The bottom line is that, once again, you argue from a position of ignorance, and little more. One of these days, you'll find yourself forced to admit that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. This may not be that day, but it should be...