View Single Post
Old 03-09-2010, 01:42 PM   #23
gettoblaster

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
634
Senior Member
Default
No, because this implies that the military is the primary driver of the debt, when it's more a result of too much entitlement spending.

You are spending more on gambling, but you're spending more 'more' on non-gambling items, so it's not like you're financially neglecting your real responsibilities. Tho in this case, the military is the real responsibility. That's a fact, even if whether it may or may not be being neglected in favor of other expenses is a matter of opinion.
If we have the resources, that indeed should be our goal. With our economy and future in trouble from too much entitlement spending, we may not be able to reach that goal, but military cuts should still be secondary to entitlement cuts.
*enjoys his mornin' grog and nods to Evil_inKarlate*

avast ye, Evil_inKarlate!

matey, i don't disagree with much that ye have scribed.

yea, and more...i have posted, with great vigor, that them entitlements that ye mentioned should not just be adjusted, nay, i've been 'o the mind that they need to be eliminated.

http://www.uspoliticsonline.com/econ...onomy-aye.html

me main point 'o this thread, though, was simply this...

them who claim that Mr. Obama be makin' big cuts in military spendin' (or any cuts, for that matter) are wrong.

its not happenin'.

so i'd ask folks to please stop repeatin' this bit 'o fiction.

YARRR!

- MeadHallPirate
gettoblaster is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:11 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity