View Single Post
Old 06-05-2010, 12:42 PM   #19
DJkillos

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
382
Senior Member
Default
Ha, ha. I can't help it, that you haven't been able to articulate the point of your post.

So far it's as if I would say:

"See, rain makes you wet."

Yea, and what?

What should I conclude from a statement like that?

Should I:
  1. Not go out in the rain
  2. Put on a rain coat
  3. Bring an umbrella

You have thus far failed to state your position as it relates to your OP.

Are you being critical of a particular policy?

Are you suggesting preemption on all known lawless regimes and entities?

On one hand I think you're suggesting preemption, yet on the other hand you bring up the cost of our response to 9/11. Is it your contention that we should have taken more severe preemptive actions to prevent 9/11? Or should we have responded to 9/11 more modestly?

So, could you articulate the point of your post? I would be interested in this discussion if it has a point.
Then why don't you wander over to a thread that makes sense to you? You're adding absolutely NOTHING here. Check "The Basement". You're just a hologram of Tann, you don't want discussion, but to stir shit. Stir away, I ain't playin after this waste of time post.
DJkillos is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity