DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Afghan Cover-up?

**voksveta** · 09-04-2010, 02:24 PM

You realize how big of a no-no it is to mark ANYTHING that isn't an IRC item with a red cross, right?

(And with really fucking good reason.)

Yes I do and for that reason it was legal to shoot the van. Ans since it is a NO NO why is the left crying about the van being hit? Are the gunners supposed to have X-ray vision and be able to see who is in it?

If the TV or news crew was using it, the van, why didn't they mark the van or their vehicle with TV or PRESS. I have seen photos of such cars. Those are not targeted.

Bottom line: it was a perfectly legal action. Sad that some innocents were caught up in it but nothing was done wrong.

09-04-2010, 02:24 PM	#17
voksveta Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 579 Senior Member	You realize how big of a no-no it is to mark ANYTHING that isn't an IRC item with a red cross, right? (And with really fucking good reason.) Yes I do and for that reason it was legal to shoot the van. Ans since it is a NO NO why is the left crying about the van being hit? Are the gunners supposed to have X-ray vision and be able to see who is in it? If the TV or news crew was using it, the van, why didn't they mark the van or their vehicle with TV or PRESS. I have seen photos of such cars. Those are not targeted. Bottom line: it was a perfectly legal action. Sad that some innocents were caught up in it but nothing was done wrong.
	Quote