DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**rojettafoxx** · 05-02-2010, 03:02 AM

Asking him a few more questions and taking a closer look at his situation probably would have. A young male travelling alone on a one way ticket with no luggage should have prompted some closer scrutiny. It certainly would have on El Al.

So why are you being so socialist in your recommendations? Can't someone operate a business without having the feds walking all over their private property 24/7?

People should have no government guarantee of flying. Because of this, they should also have no guarantee of exceptional security for the purposes of flying. It is both expensive for the taxpayers and sometimes unjust for the property owners. Frankly, if you don't like the security, then you don't fly on that plane! I don't get a free bodyguard when I get in a taxi, do I? What about when I go to a restaurant? All of these serve the public and they do not come with forced government bodyguards.

05-02-2010, 03:02 AM	#35
rojettafoxx Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 384 Senior Member	Asking him a few more questions and taking a closer look at his situation probably would have. A young male travelling alone on a one way ticket with no luggage should have prompted some closer scrutiny. It certainly would have on El Al. So why are you being so socialist in your recommendations? Can't someone operate a business without having the feds walking all over their private property 24/7? People should have no government guarantee of flying. Because of this, they should also have no guarantee of exceptional security for the purposes of flying. It is both expensive for the taxpayers and sometimes unjust for the property owners. Frankly, if you don't like the security, then you don't fly on that plane! I don't get a free bodyguard when I get in a taxi, do I? What about when I go to a restaurant? All of these serve the public and they do not come with forced government bodyguards.
	Quote