DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**bingookenoo** · 04-23-2011, 01:18 AM

I agree 110% with NOT. The idea of a lottery is moronic in the extreme. Why should the outcome of a rally be anymore affected by chance than it already is?

The BEST solution that has ever been proposed to the solution is reversing the order of the top 10/15 OR allowing the drivers to choose their positions though this should only be done if the halfwit Garry Connelly isn't present at the rally.

If driver X is the leader of the championship then why should he be disadvantaged? Why not let the sick dogs as NOT calls them, clear the gravel for the real drivers?

04-23-2011, 01:18 AM	#20
bingookenoo Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 380 Senior Member	I agree 110% with NOT. The idea of a lottery is moronic in the extreme. Why should the outcome of a rally be anymore affected by chance than it already is? The BEST solution that has ever been proposed to the solution is reversing the order of the top 10/15 OR allowing the drivers to choose their positions though this should only be done if the halfwit Garry Connelly isn't present at the rally. If driver X is the leader of the championship then why should he be disadvantaged? Why not let the sick dogs as NOT calls them, clear the gravel for the real drivers?
	Quote