View Single Post
Old 11-09-2006, 06:16 PM   #12
AM1VV9r6

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
Quote, originally posted by Cozz »Under Clintons' Administration, no attacking was ever stopped. This is what pisses me off the most under his two terms. If Clinton did more then maybe, just maybe we wouldn't be where we are right now. Not saying Bush is doing any better because going the wrong way about things is just as bad as doing nothing. But this is just my oppinion and nothing more.
What bothers me is the following: I rember after Bush coming to power in January 2001, he and his administration talked only about nuclear threats (especially by North Korea). Not a word about terrorism, Al Queda, or Osama bin Laden.
The US security priority was a nuclear rocket shield, not war on terrorism.
So, Bush administration didn't pay any attention to terrorism befor 9/11: therefore 9/11 came as a surprise for them (despite CIA reports & warnings).
Go check the news archives from January 2001 - September 2001 and you will see what I am talking about.
AM1VV9r6 is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:20 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity