DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Rove

**actrisski** · 04-04-2010, 01:07 AM

I never said I was against it "from the get-go". I wouldn't expect you to understand the intel aspect of it.

No worries, I do.
Contrary to what some people believe the president doesn't sit there and look at raw intel. It starts on a fairly low level and works up a long chain of people trained to interpret their findings. They are the ones that inform the president of information. No one is disputing that.
Basically what I'm saying is there are many hands involved in the process. There is more more sounds reasoning to be a Truther than to believe that Bush made up intel and lied about it.

-edit- Forgot to clarify one thing. I'm not a huge fan of nation building. There is a difference between kicking ass and taking names, when the times call for it, and staying there to try and force our style of governance on a foreign population. And no one is disputing that, either.

04-04-2010, 01:07 AM	#8
actrisski Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 605 Senior Member	I never said I was against it "from the get-go". I wouldn't expect you to understand the intel aspect of it. No worries, I do. Contrary to what some people believe the president doesn't sit there and look at raw intel. It starts on a fairly low level and works up a long chain of people trained to interpret their findings. They are the ones that inform the president of information. No one is disputing that. Basically what I'm saying is there are many hands involved in the process. There is more more sounds reasoning to be a Truther than to believe that Bush made up intel and lied about it. -edit- Forgot to clarify one thing. I'm not a huge fan of nation building. There is a difference between kicking ass and taking names, when the times call for it, and staying there to try and force our style of governance on a foreign population. And no one is disputing that, either.
	Quote