DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**SinyugiN** · 08-29-2012, 11:31 PM

I was going to start a thread over at History to ask about this. Several callers on the Washington Journal this morning talked about Flight 93 as a government conspiracy, (this being the big 9-11 patriotism story). One fellow said that local radio had someone reporting that they saw an explosion before it went down, wondered why he never heard that again. Another saying there were no pieces of the plane found at the crash site. There was an interview yesterday where Cheney said he ordered fighter jets up that morning.

Does anyone know exactly what happened there? Do historians agree with the conventional version?

thanks.

The majority of the "evidence" that flight 93 did not crash as stated comes from a documentary called "Loose Change", where it shows what they claim was the wreckage site where there is no aircraft debris.

What none of these detractors say is if it didn't crash as specified, then what happened to it? There has to be wreckage somewhere. And if that was the case, was the phone call from a passenger to his wife [Let's roll!"] faked? I doubt that.

The same with the claim that the Pentagon was not hit by a plane, that the nearly perfectly round hole in the wall was done by a rocket. Again, if so, what happened to the plane and its passengers and crew?

The problem with most conspiracy theories is what Benjamin Franklin so eloquently stated: "two people can keep a secret, so long as one of them is dead." In this day and age there is simply too much for an individual to gain by telling, books, movie deals etc.

08-29-2012, 11:31 PM	#16
SinyugiN Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 489 Senior Member	I was going to start a thread over at History to ask about this. Several callers on the Washington Journal this morning talked about Flight 93 as a government conspiracy, (this being the big 9-11 patriotism story). One fellow said that local radio had someone reporting that they saw an explosion before it went down, wondered why he never heard that again. Another saying there were no pieces of the plane found at the crash site. There was an interview yesterday where Cheney said he ordered fighter jets up that morning. Does anyone know exactly what happened there? Do historians agree with the conventional version? thanks. The majority of the "evidence" that flight 93 did not crash as stated comes from a documentary called "Loose Change", where it shows what they claim was the wreckage site where there is no aircraft debris. What none of these detractors say is if it didn't crash as specified, then what happened to it? There has to be wreckage somewhere. And if that was the case, was the phone call from a passenger to his wife [Let's roll!"] faked? I doubt that. The same with the claim that the Pentagon was not hit by a plane, that the nearly perfectly round hole in the wall was done by a rocket. Again, if so, what happened to the plane and its passengers and crew? The problem with most conspiracy theories is what Benjamin Franklin so eloquently stated: "two people can keep a secret, so long as one of them is dead." In this day and age there is simply too much for an individual to gain by telling, books, movie deals etc.
	Quote