View Single Post
Old 08-29-2012, 11:31 PM   #18
HilaryNidierer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
424
Senior Member
Default
Absolutely...just beat me to that thought as I was going to reply to Sluggo.

I think these days in the country we're waaaay into too much 'can't do' mode, finger pointing, excuses, etc. That stuff really has grown old with me, especially in politics and public discussion in politics, etc. The effective result of that is zero.

Where's the 'can do' spirit these days? We even have too much 'that's beyond my pay grade' or 'outside my job description' stuff...it's so limiting. Nobody can or should attempt to be a 'jack of all trades' because someone concentrating everywhere is concentrating nowhere, but that's no an excuse IMO for self-limiting the potential one can do with their skill sets and talents for being productive and getting the pride--and pay--that ought to come with it.

For example, the border is precisely a place where trained troops can do plenty of good. It's no secret that we have loads of drug dealers around there--some military trained or given military style training like Los Zetas--and the military is trained in things like how to conduct day and night patrols. Some have that for desert areas and there's plenty of that--and a problem area for border trafficking--in the US like the Sonoran Desert border area.

But, you'll hear 'can't do' types raising wild-eyed bogeymen fears of troops going jihad on immigrants and other nonsense, or someone citing the Posse Comitatus Act and ending discussion without thinking any deeper as to whether or not it can be amended to do reasonable things without destroying the original purpose of why it was enacted, etc.
Nothing in my post contradicts what you have said, or results in "zero."

My issue, exclusively, is with whom came up with the idea and how it would be implemented. Barney Frank has been running around for a while now suggesting that our spending on the military is the reason for the S&P Downgrade. Now he is making suggestion, which I am admitting to having a hard time finding text of as the OP did not include a link, that we "use" the military to rebuild infrastructure. Granted I do not have the context of the comment to reference but that sounds more like "you will do" instruction over "can do" spirit. In my post, you suggested you were going to respond to, I said I have zero issue with those coming out of the military wanting thus getting a desired help to transition into the workforce. If some want to go into planing to engineering to construction of infrastructure projects, be my guest. Again, my issue is help for the "can to" spirit becoming "you will do" from the one guy on the hill suggesting our military spending is responsible for our downgrade. He being right or wrong on that, well that is another topic. The point is, my concern is reasonable given whom we are talking about given his political interests I am not so sure are based on your commented "can do" spirit.
HilaryNidierer is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:14 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity