View Single Post
Old 06-07-2010, 01:44 AM   #20
temansertewek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
452
Senior Member
Default
According to my conversation program, it's 442.5366 lbs.ft of torque, not 44.
well according to my spelling of conversion, conversioner ,the conversion he conversed, was missing a conversation of a zero. when he most likely meant 440..etc in the conversation,but conversely I could be conversationally wrong in my conversion conversation observation.
temansertewek is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:16 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity