View Single Post
Old 04-15-2010, 09:34 PM   #16
HonjUopu

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
Also I think people with genetic disorders should not be allowed to have children... Adopted only until we perfect the procedure to select healthy DNA to have healthy children. Why further pollute our gene pool? Because our life expectancy is increasing we are starting to notice certain diseases that are more prevalent with people that have a certain strand of dna/passed on mutation and they show up in the later years. If we continue to keep healing people with these genetic diseases and allowing them to pass it on... Won't we be hurting our selves?
This sounds extreme... I don't REALLY mean we should stop people from having children that have genetic disorders... Just saying wouldnt it make sense to?
As a benefit... We would reduce the number of orphans... And slow down our population growth... In return it would also reduce the consumption... and so on.. Across the board it would help... Less and less people we bring into this world... The better. We are not insects... We are large... We are inefficient eaters (insects eat foods with much higher energy), we produce a lot of waste, and so on... we can't keep increasing in population like a swarm of locusts.
Wow. What a load of biased, unadulterated, fascist crap... completely devoid of knowledge of biology or psychology and chuck full of downright evil.

You should be ashamed of yourself.
HonjUopu is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:42 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity