DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**neeclindy** · 08-23-2009, 10:37 AM

Yes, thoes are decent numbers.

But I would have loved to see 20/30 AWD & 24/35 FWD respectivly. I guess I am just to ambitious with my thinking...

That's what it's rated. My 06 impala 3.5L gets much better than what it's rated. On a 800 mile trip I averaged 35.2MPG which is quite a bit more than what it's rated.

08-23-2009, 10:37 AM	#9
neeclindy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 408 Senior Member	Yes, thoes are decent numbers. But I would have loved to see 20/30 AWD & 24/35 FWD respectivly. I guess I am just to ambitious with my thinking... That's what it's rated. My 06 impala 3.5L gets much better than what it's rated. On a 800 mile trip I averaged 35.2MPG which is quite a bit more than what it's rated.
	Quote