DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**lmHVYs8e** · 08-01-2009, 08:48 PM

IMO it's simply a disgruntled land owner who does not want the turbines on their property.

If the land owner didn't want them there surely they wouldn't be there.

Not that hard I would say, shotgun comes to mind.

I can't see a shotgun causing that kind of damage.

08-01-2009, 08:48 PM	#12
lmHVYs8e Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 392 Senior Member	IMO it's simply a disgruntled land owner who does not want the turbines on their property. If the land owner didn't want them there surely they wouldn't be there. Not that hard I would say, shotgun comes to mind. I can't see a shotgun causing that kind of damage.
	Quote