DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Cajlwdvx** · 04-29-2008, 01:15 PM

I'm bored, so I compared the Audi to the Volvo. I think that I would still take the Volvo, but the Audi does score 4 points higher compared to the Volvo out of 100. 67 vs. 71.

The Audi like the BMW is larger exterior wise, but once again is smaller interior wise which is sort of surprising because this is a FWD system like the Volvo with the engine mounted sideways. It is even smaller interior wise then the BMW hatchback! Less room for the front and rear seats, and also less cargo volume. Does offer a peppy motor N/A but still weighs more then the Volvo, and I am sure that it gets worse economy still then the Volvo. Volvo's 2.5L Turbo pumps out more horses then the 2.0L Turbo from Audi and are rated for the same economy. The Volvo's Turbo would feel more like the 3.2L V6 from Audi then the 2.0L Turbo.

04-29-2008, 01:15 PM	#16
Cajlwdvx Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 654 Senior Member	I'm bored, so I compared the Audi to the Volvo. I think that I would still take the Volvo, but the Audi does score 4 points higher compared to the Volvo out of 100. 67 vs. 71. The Audi like the BMW is larger exterior wise, but once again is smaller interior wise which is sort of surprising because this is a FWD system like the Volvo with the engine mounted sideways. It is even smaller interior wise then the BMW hatchback! Less room for the front and rear seats, and also less cargo volume. Does offer a peppy motor N/A but still weighs more then the Volvo, and I am sure that it gets worse economy still then the Volvo. Volvo's 2.5L Turbo pumps out more horses then the 2.0L Turbo from Audi and are rated for the same economy. The Volvo's Turbo would feel more like the 3.2L V6 from Audi then the 2.0L Turbo.
	Quote