DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**tomsmuidh** · 07-30-2007, 07:21 AM

Well no doubt about that. I think for the price of admission, it's probably not worth getting HD content onto an SD or EDTV. You'd be better off spending that same money on making the move to HD. But there would definitely be a noticeable improvement in image quality over an SD feed.

Well I was thinking more about the size of the HD screen really, I'm only going on what I've read at av forums around the net, but something like a 26" HD TV really won't show off how good the picture quality is on BD/HD compared to a DVD player with a good upscaler. I'm not saying there would be no difference between the two, but is it a difference that is necessarily worth £500.

I'm not going to get into the issue of "1080 only works on

07-30-2007, 07:21 AM	#20
tomsmuidh Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 573 Senior Member	Well no doubt about that. I think for the price of admission, it's probably not worth getting HD content onto an SD or EDTV. You'd be better off spending that same money on making the move to HD. But there would definitely be a noticeable improvement in image quality over an SD feed. Well I was thinking more about the size of the HD screen really, I'm only going on what I've read at av forums around the net, but something like a 26" HD TV really won't show off how good the picture quality is on BD/HD compared to a DVD player with a good upscaler. I'm not saying there would be no difference between the two, but is it a difference that is necessarily worth £500. I'm not going to get into the issue of "1080 only works on
	Quote