View Single Post
Old 06-13-2009, 09:47 PM   #38
videolkif

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
354
Senior Member
Default


I don't know, but their allegations against Sunni Islam and their whole concepts being based on blatant lies and mistranslations pretty much proves their religion to be wrong!
^

Salam Alaykum,

I would like to point out, as I did before, that sunnidefence is Alhamdullilah a good site and it is doing a good job in refuting parts of AA.org.

However, and this is my own opinion, is is not better to discredit the "grand Rabbis" of Twelver Shiaism, since their status is much much higher than that of AA.org, and they have written tens of thousands of books trying to discredit Islam and the Muslims.

Thus I think, that unless AA.org has gotten Ijaza (so as to say) from the top Rabbis in Qom or Najaf, then any serious Twelver Shia debater will simply brush off such refutations, since the AA.org site was not meant to be a site of Shia Rabbis to begin with.

This brother answers it for me, imo.

However, we should show have more akhlaq than to call them "grand rabbis". The Quran is very clear about calling people even negative nicknames, furthermore, it is not the Sunnah of the Prophet(PBUH) to call other people who pray and believe in God and the angels and the Messengers and the Last Day such names.

Also, Sunni Defense makes the same mistake of Answering Ansar by not bothering to check the authenticity of hadiths they post. Image we show a Shia a quote from Al Kafi, and they tell us that the hadith is weak because "Person 1" is weak, "Person 2" was known for ghulut, and "Person 3" is majhool! Imagine how silly we will look. They should say "such and such hadith is sahih according to Allamah Majlisi on his book "X", Pg. X"
videolkif is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:31 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity