DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Imam Muhammad ibn al-Hasan al-Shaybani's Reliability in Narrating Hadith

**newspetty** · 02-18-2011, 11:55 PM

One think i have learnt is that these ignoramus fools have just one book which i think they refer to for all things hanafi related. Have you actually read the book? does the book not contain praise for Imam Abu Hanifah??? Is Khateeb al Bahdadi ra considered an authority on deen in the same way as Imam Abu Hanifah, Imam Malik, Imam Shafi, Imam Ahmed? So you prefer to take some of views from the book over everything and everyone else. (dont forget that Tareekh Baghdad isnt all negative about the imam).

You didnt answer that. So if Imam Bukhari praises Ali Ibn al Madini more than anyone else and Ali Ibn al Madini then praises Imam Shaybani, how is that not credible. You are talking about Imam Bukhari who is arguably the greatest muhaddith to have graced this earth, and his praise for someone doesnt count for anything?

Why would u mention a book whose author according to many Hanafis is mutashadid and has tasub against Hanafis? Indeed Tareekh e Baghdad has so many other biographies as well.When did i say that Khateeb Al Baghdad ra has only criticized Imam Abu hanifa? The criticism of Imam Abu hanifa ra in Tareekh e baghdad is spread on 54 pages ( refer to Masnad e Imam Abu hanfia page 48 ptinted by Maktaba e Rehmaniya) .
Mr A praised Mr C and Mr C then praised Mr X so this means that Mr A must be having positive thoughts or praise for Mr X? Common sense is far better than hizzbiya. Where do u put the criticism of all those great Muhaditheens regarding Mohamad Bin Hassan Al shaibani?
What do u mean by that highlighted portion of your post?

02-18-2011, 11:55 PM	#17
newspetty Join Date Dec 2005 Posts 501 Senior Member	One think i have learnt is that these ignoramus fools have just one book which i think they refer to for all things hanafi related. Have you actually read the book? does the book not contain praise for Imam Abu Hanifah??? Is Khateeb al Bahdadi ra considered an authority on deen in the same way as Imam Abu Hanifah, Imam Malik, Imam Shafi, Imam Ahmed? So you prefer to take some of views from the book over everything and everyone else. (dont forget that Tareekh Baghdad isnt all negative about the imam). You didnt answer that. So if Imam Bukhari praises Ali Ibn al Madini more than anyone else and Ali Ibn al Madini then praises Imam Shaybani, how is that not credible. You are talking about Imam Bukhari who is arguably the greatest muhaddith to have graced this earth, and his praise for someone doesnt count for anything? Why would u mention a book whose author according to many Hanafis is mutashadid and has tasub against Hanafis? Indeed Tareekh e Baghdad has so many other biographies as well.When did i say that Khateeb Al Baghdad ra has only criticized Imam Abu hanifa? The criticism of Imam Abu hanifa ra in Tareekh e baghdad is spread on 54 pages ( refer to Masnad e Imam Abu hanfia page 48 ptinted by Maktaba e Rehmaniya) . Mr A praised Mr C and Mr C then praised Mr X so this means that Mr A must be having positive thoughts or praise for Mr X? Common sense is far better than hizzbiya. Where do u put the criticism of all those great Muhaditheens regarding Mohamad Bin Hassan Al shaibani? What do u mean by that highlighted portion of your post?
	Quote