[Matajic]

With regards to the 3 points mentioned. I still don't get how what you said is very different to what I said. Anyway as your opinion and interpretation is more towards husne dann then I shall follow what you have said. With regards to the first point...ok your interpretation is better....with regards to your 2nd point...I don't know how you understood maulana madni said that. He clearly stated that terrorism is coming from pakistan not from india. That it is 1 way. The 3rd statement 70% would stand up for the rights of muslims? Ok...let us assume that he is being diplomatic. But do you really think 70% would stand up for muslims? It has been shown time and time again that a sizeable majority have complete hatred towards islam. Most people would actually be silent and ignore what is going on? I mean if there was a riot or something the majority would just carry on with their life...a very tiny minority would stand up...and a sizeable minority would actually join in the mayhem. Not many would actively help muslims trust me. This was proven in Gujrat where neighbours who had known families for centuries raped muslim ladies and burnt and looted shops etc. This is in stark contrast to the behaviour of muslims. When the Babri masjid incident happened some guys from my village were going to attack a temple. They were stopped and told what did these guys do? No-one would dare rape ladies. Even during partition time the trains of non-muslims going from muslim dominated terrorities were not burnt, women kidnapped etc. However those travelling from hindu/sikh dominated areas were attacked, kidnapped etc. There is a long history....I personally find way more tolerance in the UK compared to places like India.

Anyway I can see maulana madni saheb is in a difficult situation. Inshallah there is an alim from India who is a great thinker...from a great family of ulema. I have previously discussed such things with him. I shall ask his opinion and see what he says....