View Single Post
Old 06-11-2012, 01:16 AM   #12
medprof

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
510
Senior Member
Default
What are you on about?

Let us assume you're argument actually holds any wait (in reality, it doesn't, because Bashar is not a shar'i Imam, no bay'ah was taken from him, and his secularism and nusayrism puts some serious question marks on his Iman). . .

You guys are equally guilty of hypocrisy. If you believe in rebellion against a non-shar'i Imam such as what Imam al-Husayn did to Yazid, why don't you support the Syrians? Just because you believe the wahhabis are hypocrites, why do you have to be one too? Why can't you support both? You should go back to high school and learn about the fallacy of False Dilemma.

Before you start spewing emotional rhetoric, consider your own position.

By the way, I support the rebellions of Imam al-Husayn, Imam Zayd, Imam an-Nafs az-Zakiyyah and the rest.
Whatever dude! Books of najdi's are full of dis-respect to ahle-bayt.

So shut up okay.

and how did bashr come into power.. 76% sunnis are in syria . were they sleeping ????

Sunnis are always dumb and stupid... you know why because there are sunni's who say shia-sunni unity etc and think shia are our brothers..

Death to shia , Kill a shia u will get a reward of killing 2 jews.

they are the one spoiling ahlus sunnah wal jamah from its roots , then we have najdi wahabies who are convincing people that they r ahlus sunnah wal jamah.. But hey danny they are not !

then we have a sect in the sub continent (deobandi's ) who thinks the najdi's are our brothers.... many deobnadi's dont but many do ..... they are totaaly essed up in their heads. different opinions

Let me tell you openly on this forum what The problem with deobandi's is

1) it doesn't know what it has to eat and what it has to throw up



Shaykh Abd
al-Aziz al-Dehlawi (Allah have mercy on him), after studying Ibn Taymiyya�s Minhaj
al-Sunnah, was immensely distressed by his undermining of the Ahl al-Bayt (members
of the Prophet's family) and the Sufis.
Imam Anwar Shah al-Kashmiri then mentioned that his teacher Shaykh Mawlana
Husayn Ahmad al-Madani (Allah have mercy on him) was quite unsympathetic towards
Imam Ibn Taymiyya. He even disliked the title of �Shaykh al-Islam� being used for
him, hence he became upset when Shaykh Muhammad Zakariyya al-Kandahlawi (Allah
have mercy on him) used this title for Imam Ibn Taymiyya in one his works.
He then goes on to say that the most balanced approach with regards to Imam Ibn
Taymiyya is the approach of Imam Dhahabi, Imam Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani and others, in
that one may benefit from his great and extensive works, but be wary of his isolated
positions that number many in matters of Creed (usul) and particulars of Islamic
jurisprudence (furu�). This is the position of our (Deobandi) scholars. (Malfuzat
Muhaddith Kashmiri, P: 413-414)


see both attachments if you got the guts & dare to reply back



so things are very much messed up ...

That's the reason i don't give a damn to these immature deobandi scholars whom you see giving opinions here & there.

They are all sold out

The likes of Maulana ashraf ali thanwi ra , Maulana Qasim Nanotwi ra will always be missed ....

Infact these immature deobandi scholars should wash their mouth 3 times with the Holy ZamZam water before taking the name of Maulana Ashraf ali thanvi ra , Maulana Qasim nanotwi ra from their rotten mouths.
medprof is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity