DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Deobandi Ulemahs position on the creation of Pakistan

**Agedprepdoock** · 03-28-2011, 06:22 AM

Pakistan was the result of the idea that 'Muslims are a single, separate nation', but the name 'Bengladesh' itself suggests that the East Pakistanis were too Indianised to accept what would essentially be an Arabicised society in its final shape from Morocco to Indonesia. It is Bengladesh that is divisiveness embodied (or rather politicized) in that it divided itself from the pan-Islamic legacy of Muhammad Ali Jauhar and the Khilafat Movement called PAKISTAN; Pakistan on the other hand is all about unity of the Muslims as a single separate nation.

you are talking a whole lot of bull... everything you've said in this thread is from the ultra-nationalist pak point of view. the same POV of the military, PPP and PML. the same sort of racism that has killed millions in bengal, thousands in baloch, and now thousands in NWFP and FATA. and for what?? they werent "pakistani" enough for you? cuz they spoke a different language, had a different culture?

pashto, balochi, bengali just arent up to the level of your "arabisized" pakistani, whatever the heck thats even supposed to mean. i know exactly which ideology you are of. and ive seen many people like that. people who are complete delusional.

aside from that, i agree with everything brother Abulayl said. someone who actually knows some history and sense. keep exposing these ultra-nationalist and fascist minded people.

03-28-2011, 06:22 AM	#39
Agedprepdoock Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 426 Senior Member	Pakistan was the result of the idea that 'Muslims are a single, separate nation', but the name 'Bengladesh' itself suggests that the East Pakistanis were too Indianised to accept what would essentially be an Arabicised society in its final shape from Morocco to Indonesia. It is Bengladesh that is divisiveness embodied (or rather politicized) in that it divided itself from the pan-Islamic legacy of Muhammad Ali Jauhar and the Khilafat Movement called PAKISTAN; Pakistan on the other hand is all about unity of the Muslims as a single separate nation. you are talking a whole lot of bull... everything you've said in this thread is from the ultra-nationalist pak point of view. the same POV of the military, PPP and PML. the same sort of racism that has killed millions in bengal, thousands in baloch, and now thousands in NWFP and FATA. and for what?? they werent "pakistani" enough for you? cuz they spoke a different language, had a different culture? pashto, balochi, bengali just arent up to the level of your "arabisized" pakistani, whatever the heck thats even supposed to mean. i know exactly which ideology you are of. and ive seen many people like that. people who are complete delusional. aside from that, i agree with everything brother Abulayl said. someone who actually knows some history and sense. keep exposing these ultra-nationalist and fascist minded people.
	Quote