DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**brraverishhh** · 06-05-2012, 10:31 PM

You sound like a Wahhabi now. Don't you mean you can't translate "huwa" because by translating it to "he" you are making a similitude between Allah and the creation?

Wrong topic. And flawed argument for He is used in English language even without real gender. And we dont say translation in itself is similitude. Utter nonsense. Fact is you affirm the apparent meaning and in this case a wahhabi should affirm male gender as per so called "apparent" meaning criteria of your manhaj.

06-05-2012, 10:31 PM	#16
brraverishhh Join Date Jan 2006 Posts 5,127 Senior Member	You sound like a Wahhabi now. Don't you mean you can't translate "huwa" because by translating it to "he" you are making a similitude between Allah and the creation? Wrong topic. And flawed argument for He is used in English language even without real gender. And we dont say translation in itself is similitude. Utter nonsense. Fact is you affirm the apparent meaning and in this case a wahhabi should affirm male gender as per so called "apparent" meaning criteria of your manhaj.
	Quote