DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**soitlyobserty** · 06-03-2012, 10:45 PM

On the positive side she managed to say that it was not the partition of India but of Punjab and Bengal.
I do not think that the host (Zainab Badawi? Is she a Muslim?) or Dawkins would get the purport that the British divided Muslims into three parts! And you are right people should know before hand into whom they are bumping. Another good thing is that BD got some slot - you only here inconvenient things about BD. Also ZB did acknowledge something about women's role in BD (and P) politics.

Finally how come a Bhutto becomes a Booto?

06-03-2012, 10:45 PM	#7
soitlyobserty Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 455 Senior Member	On the positive side she managed to say that it was not the partition of India but of Punjab and Bengal. I do not think that the host (Zainab Badawi? Is she a Muslim?) or Dawkins would get the purport that the British divided Muslims into three parts! And you are right people should know before hand into whom they are bumping. Another good thing is that BD got some slot - you only here inconvenient things about BD. Also ZB did acknowledge something about women's role in BD (and P) politics. Finally how come a Bhutto becomes a Booto?
	Quote