Yes Maimondes was on the run. This was the time of political upheavel in Andulucia which eventually resulted in loss of control into smaller shaikhdom. Any opposing voice be it muslim or non muslim made little difference. There was section that went to Maghrib. The contingency going to the east was small compare to Ottoman territory. As far as I remember Ezypt was at the time also had shairah law. The khilafat became symbolic anyway. The Shariah law applied was not. Turks are right in voicing their oppositon to being called genocide at then end of the ottomon rule. No doubt violation occur. The same thing happen to the turks. Also there has to be documented evidance to be called genocide. Death resulting from war and deseases can't be called genocide. Genocide implies mass murder like the one in Libya by the italian or the eugenic programs by the Dutch in Namiba which finally manifested in germany's holocaust. Allahualam