[RCQDnMp5]

http://thewahhabithreat.wordpress.co...700-till-2011/

Abu Muhammad Ibraheem al-Hanbali says:
August 3, 2011 at 3:22 am

Allah has revealed the ayah “The truth has come and falsehood as perished”. This ayah was revealed upon the conquest of Mecca. All idol worshipped was destroyed in Arabia, and Shaytaan lost all hope of taghut being worshipped ever again in Arabia. Whoever says that the Prophet’s grave has become an idol that is worshipped is a Kaafir, for denying the words of Allah and His Rasul sal Allahu alayhi wasallam, this is the opinion of those who considered Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab a Kaafir, with reason. After all, they are saying the Prophet sal Allahu alayhi wasallam lied when he said “Wallahi, I do not fear that my ummah will fall into shirk”.

Al-Qadi Iyad, Imaam Muwaafaq ud-Deen and Imaam Nawawi all quote the evidence of facing the Messenger of Allah. What you quote is unheard of and highly doubtful to be the words of the Imaams mentioned.

The Prophet sal Allahu alayhi wasallam was buried in his house, he was buried on the ground. The thing that Wahhabis waggle on about being an elevated grave is simply a wooden box placed on top of the grave to stop the people of the past from sitting on the grave. As for the Dome, the dome was not built over his grave, but over his house. Wahhabis admit they want to destroy this and it displays their hypocrisy.

They can quote how much they want from Imaam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar al-Asqalaani on building domes over graves, but the simple fact is, the green dome is the very same dome that they both saw with their own eyes, and yet they said nothing about it should be destroyed. Only the Wahhabis seem to arrive at this conclusion.

The Wahhabis are in great kufr concerning their creed. They say:

1. The mushrikeen were upon tawheed ur-Rububiyyah – Yet this is refuted by the simple fact they took Lords besides Allah, they worshipped a pantheon of deities besides Allah, and considered Allah to be the top ranking god of this pantheon. Yet the Wahhabies suggest their tawheed would have been perfect had not CALLED UPON others besides Allah. This is because their understanding of shirk is flawed within itself.

2. The Wahhabis define tawheed ul-Uuhiyyah to single Allah out in worship, and at the same time they define shirk to CALL UPON others besides Allah. They say the ONLY thing that negated the faith of the mushrikeen is that they CALLED UPON others besides Allah. Wahhabis do not take into account that the mushrikeen BELIEVED in 360 gods and attributed to them powers of divinity. All they was called to do [according to Wahhabi Islam] is to stop calling upon them and SINGLE OUT Allah in WORSHIP. This is the shirk in the Wahhabi creed, because to define tawheed as to SINGLE OUT ALLAH IN WORSHIP is like saying, “there is a moon god, a sun god, a hubal god, hmmm i think I will pick the Allah god to worship, I still believe in those gods, but I will just single out Allah today in my pantheon of taghut”. Let it be known, that the mere belief of another god of the possibility besides Allah merits disbelief, not to believe in 360 gods and then all of a sudden it only becomes shirk when they are CALLED UPON. This is the folly of Wahhabi creed.

3. Redefining the terms is a big problem in the Wahhabi creed. They have raped the classical terminologies and then applied new meanings to them. They have CHANGED the meaning of tawheed. They have CHANGED the meaning of shirk, They have CHANGED the meaning of ilah, They have CHANGED the meaning of Ibaadah, They have CHANGED the meaning of Dua’.

They misconstrue the hadeeth ad-dua huwa al-Ibaadah and say all du’a is worship.
Then they accuse the people who call upon the Prophet of grave worship. However, we do not understand this type of du’a to be ibaadah, just as we do not define sending Salah [sending peace and blessings on the Prophet] on the Prophet as ibaadah.

When Wahhabis say all dua is ibaadah contradict the Qu’ran where Allah said: Surah an-Nur [24] ayah 63:“la taj’alu du’a ar-Rasul baynakum ka- du’a ba’dikum ba’da”Which translates as:“Do not make the calling [du’a] of the Messenger between you like the calling [du’a] of each other”. If all dua is worship then either Allah is wrong or the Wahhabiyyah are wrong in their defintion. When we call upon the living or the dead, is this du’a the du’a of worship? Is ALL DUA WORSHIP? Simply put no.

The fact of the matter is they quote ayah’s like the Khawaarij because they are the Khawaarij. This is exactly what our “friend” is upon as you can clearly see by his style of Qur’anic quotation. Does this brother even consider Surah Fusssilaat, ayah 40, where Allah says:

Indeed, those who misinterpret Our ayat are not concealed from Us. So, is he who is cast into the Fire better or he who comes secure on the Day of Resurrection? Do whatever you will; indeed, He is Seeing of what you do.

Does they ponder over the very words of the beloved Prophet Muhammad sal Allahu alayhi wasallam when he said: The holy Prophet said:

“What I fear most in my community is a man who interprets passages of the Qur’an out of their context”

Does they reflect over the words of Ibn Abbas, the one who was given direct understanding of the Qur’an three times over when said:

“Do not be like the Khawarij, interpreting the ayat of the Qur’an about the common Muslims and it was only sent down regarding the People of the Book and the idol worshippers. So they were ignorant of its’ knowledge and they used it to spill the blood, seize wealth and make the charge of astrayness against Muslim Orthodoxy. You must have the knowledge of what was sent down by way of these things in the Qur’an.”

Does they consider the words of Ibn Umar who said about people who use ayahs in the very fashion that they do:

“They are the most evil of Allah’s creation for they re-interpret the passages that were revealed about the Kuffar and used them upon the [Muslim] believers” Saheeh al-Bukhaari, vol. 9, p. 50; Fath ul-Baari, vol. 12, Kitaab Istitaabat ul-Murtadeen, p. 397

They accuse the believers of shirk and kufr by re-interpreting the passages that were revealed by the Kuffar and them applying them to the believers. The Holy Prophet sal Allahu alayhi wasallam said to the effect that they would not understand the Qur’an when he said “They will recite the Qur’an but it will not go past their throats”

? Do they consider ? no. they are dumbstruck


Don't come & attack me . I'm just taking time reading this.

You see you should hear all sides and come to a judgement