DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**lymnCymment** · 05-27-2012, 03:05 PM

you perpetuated the title "luther of islam"...not a wise choice.

anyways honestly speaking i don't see how anything you could write on this thread would be of benefit. if you feel in the mood for salafi bashing go search up and read some of the threads buried on this forum, there are some academic ones if you search hard enough that will allow you to actually to get a solid grasp on this whole issue and eventually you'll come to the conclusion as did Abu Zakariyaa that we are all ahlesunnah wal Jamah.

you'll notice this thread was not intended to be a salafi-bashing or anti Ibn Taymiyyah one.

Hafiz Gee, with due respect as you are quite a senior member on this forum, do you agree with Dr. Ati words below ?

They concept propagated is that all the four are Ahli sunnah wal jamaat and the Salafis are the strangers in the town. It takes a good amount of time for them to realize that Salfis are an tributary of the Hanbalis and they Hanbalis have differed in Aqeedah from the Ashartites and maturidis through out the history. If yes, is the nature of difference in Aqeedah between Hanbali Mazhab and the other 3 schools of thought as grave as to take either them [hambali] or the other three schools out of Ahle-Sunnah Wal Jamaat. If Yes, then fine but if No, then I believe you should have first replied to Dr. Ati for the quotes above before writing back to warea.

05-27-2012, 03:05 PM	#14
lymnCymment Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 395 Senior Member	you perpetuated the title "luther of islam"...not a wise choice. anyways honestly speaking i don't see how anything you could write on this thread would be of benefit. if you feel in the mood for salafi bashing go search up and read some of the threads buried on this forum, there are some academic ones if you search hard enough that will allow you to actually to get a solid grasp on this whole issue and eventually you'll come to the conclusion as did Abu Zakariyaa that we are all ahlesunnah wal Jamah. you'll notice this thread was not intended to be a salafi-bashing or anti Ibn Taymiyyah one. Hafiz Gee, with due respect as you are quite a senior member on this forum, do you agree with Dr. Ati words below ? They concept propagated is that all the four are Ahli sunnah wal jamaat and the Salafis are the strangers in the town. It takes a good amount of time for them to realize that Salfis are an tributary of the Hanbalis and they Hanbalis have differed in Aqeedah from the Ashartites and maturidis through out the history. If yes, is the nature of difference in Aqeedah between Hanbali Mazhab and the other 3 schools of thought as grave as to take either them [hambali] or the other three schools out of Ahle-Sunnah Wal Jamaat. If Yes, then fine but if No, then I believe you should have first replied to Dr. Ati for the quotes above before writing back to warea.
	Quote