[isogeople]

i didnt reply to ati because i didnt care for an aqeedah discussion.

i adressed warea because i sympathize with him to an extent he is where i was a two years ago, when i was first introduced to the aqeedah wars. and it seemed like everything was all find and dandy and then Ibn Taymiyyah came along and messed everything up...but that was never the case. I have since progressed and see things a lot more clearly now.whatever our differences with him Ibn Taymiyyah was a great alim, zahid etc. the tone warea was using was not the most respectful to Ib Taymiyyah. i think he might have been forgetting that despite our differences with Ibn taymyyah we do not compare to the dirt on his shoes..so how can we call him anything or dub him the "luther of islam"?

I take similar approach to Shaykh Ib Arabi.

I find the balanced approach to Ibn Taymyyah can be discovered in the writings of deobandi scholars.