[Qdcqxffs]

Being a hanafi, i believe there's a too much taqleedi jamood that has crept into madhabists and at times our bias is as clear as the blue sky. This approach makes you ignore reality and the ruling thats more closer to haqq.
As far as hanbalis are concerned, they've gone much deeper into these ashari/maturidi/athari debates which i feel was never needed. I know many of the deobandi scholars, let alone the laymen, who know absolutely nothing about this issue and i mean it. They know that there's a difference but no one delves deeper into it. No deobandi, atleast those who I know, heard this issue from a deo maulana but learnt if from internet esp salafi sites.

A sincere advice is that you keep your aqidah simple and straight. We have far bigger issues to deal with. We, with all our differences, need to stick together. As for fiqh that should totally be a non issue as those differences have existed for years.