You know nothing about the Hanbali Madhab nor it's Usool, so your opinion concerning what has been hijacked or not hijacked means nothing, and this is only from a FIQHI standpoint. Being a "Wahhabi" has zero effect on whether or not one follows the Hanbali Madhab, in Fact both Ibn Abdul Wahhab and His sons testified to following the Hanbali Madhab. As for "Laa madhabis" I don't see why they would translate from a Madhab, if they are "Laa Madhabis".. I do have friends that don't follow a Madhab, and all I call them are Muslims. I know they wouldn't translate from the Madhab because they don't know Arabic. So the question is, what (according to you) is a "Real" Hanbali?