DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**romalama** · 05-27-2012, 08:14 PM

The Saudi hanbalis in general are considered Salafis... While you might not claim to be salafi you argue with their tongue... which doesn't surprise us because you are influenced by the people who are at the origins of Salafism...

In our eyes... Salafism is a cult who aim is eradicate the world of Asharism, maturidism, Sufism all of which we consider core aspects of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah... And this new attempt of salafism to hide under the disguise of Hanbalism (which is how we look at you...) is yet another attempt of Ahlul Bidah to try and eradicate Ahlus Sunnah from the world...

Because the Salafis have failed at convincing the Muslim world that madhabs are not needed.... So now the present themselves as
Hanbalis.... To make it appear that they are just like us... *

We are not easily deceived by this new attempt of the salafis to hide under the disguise as Hanbalis because they are traditional Hanbalis in Syria, Palestine, Lebenon, and Egypt who truly embrace the Asharis and Maturidis and we embrace them...

Al Hamdullah....

Too much talk and not enough knowledge.

What is your definition of Salafi that I deny?

Look at me however you want, I really don't care... The point is I have not said anything except that someone BEFORE ibn Taymiyah from the HANAABILAH have said.

The scholars of Najd have never told or tried to convince anyone to not follow Madhabs. Even if they don't consider it Fardh for the LAYMAN to do so, this has nothing to do with "Salafi" it has to do with the Usool of the Hanbali madhab.

If your defintion of True Hanbali is that they "Embrace" the Asharis/Maturidis, then I still say you know nothing about Ibn Qudaama, and this is why I said you are talking too much without knowledge.

There are many Saudi Scholars, and I'm not saying that all of them follow the Hanbali Madhab, however the ones on my blog generally do, and that was the point in my original post.

05-27-2012, 08:14 PM	#38
romalama Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 400 Senior Member	The Saudi hanbalis in general are considered Salafis... While you might not claim to be salafi you argue with their tongue... which doesn't surprise us because you are influenced by the people who are at the origins of Salafism... In our eyes... Salafism is a cult who aim is eradicate the world of Asharism, maturidism, Sufism all of which we consider core aspects of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah... And this new attempt of salafism to hide under the disguise of Hanbalism (which is how we look at you...) is yet another attempt of Ahlul Bidah to try and eradicate Ahlus Sunnah from the world... Because the Salafis have failed at convincing the Muslim world that madhabs are not needed.... So now the present themselves as Hanbalis.... To make it appear that they are just like us... * We are not easily deceived by this new attempt of the salafis to hide under the disguise as Hanbalis because they are traditional Hanbalis in Syria, Palestine, Lebenon, and Egypt who truly embrace the Asharis and Maturidis and we embrace them... Al Hamdullah.... Too much talk and not enough knowledge. What is your definition of Salafi that I deny? Look at me however you want, I really don't care... The point is I have not said anything except that someone BEFORE ibn Taymiyah from the HANAABILAH have said. The scholars of Najd have never told or tried to convince anyone to not follow Madhabs. Even if they don't consider it Fardh for the LAYMAN to do so, this has nothing to do with "Salafi" it has to do with the Usool of the Hanbali madhab. If your defintion of True Hanbali is that they "Embrace" the Asharis/Maturidis, then I still say you know nothing about Ibn Qudaama, and this is why I said you are talking too much without knowledge. There are many Saudi Scholars, and I'm not saying that all of them follow the Hanbali Madhab, however the ones on my blog generally do, and that was the point in my original post.
	Quote